Show Summary Details
International Relations TheoriesDiscipline and Diversity

International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity (4th edn)

Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith
Page of

Printed from Oxford Politics Trove. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

Subscriber: null; date: 12 August 2022

p. 323Bibliographylocked

p. 323Bibliographylocked

  • Tim Dunne,
  • Milja Kurki
  •  and Steve Smith
  • Published in print: 21 January 2016
  • Published online: September 2017
  • Abbott, A. (2001), Chaos of Disciplines (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
  • ———— (2002), ‘The Disciplines and the Future’, in S. Brint (ed.), The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press), 205–30.
  • Acharya, A. and Johnston, A. I. (eds) (2007), Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Adler, E. (1997), ‘Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics’, European Journal of International Relations, 3/3: 319–63.
  • Adler, E. and Pouliot, V. (eds) (2011), International Practices (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Adorno, T. and Horkheimer, M. (1972), The Dialectic of Enlightenment (New York: Herder).
  • Agathangelou, A. and Ling, L. (2008), Empire and Insecurity in World Politics: Seductions of Neoliberalism (New York: Routledge).
  • Agathangelou, A. M. and Ling, L. H. M. (2009), Transforming World Politics: From Empire to Multiple Worlds (London: Routledge).
  • Aggarwal, V. K. (1998), ‘Reconciling Multiple Institutions: Bargaining, Linkages, and Nesting’, in V. K. Aggarwal (ed.), Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages, and Nesting (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), 1–31.
  • ———— (2009), ‘The Dynamics of Trade Liberalization’, in H. Milner and A. Moravcsik (eds), Power, Interdepence, and Nonstate Actors in World Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), 164–82.
  • Ahmed, A. (1992), In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures (New York: Verso).
  • Albin, C. and Druckman, D. (2014) ‘Procedures Matter: Justice and Effectiveness in International Trade Negotiations’, European Journal of International Relations, 20/4: 1014–42.
  • Alderson, K. and Hurrell, A. (2000), Hedley Bull on International Society (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
  • de Almeida, J. M. (2003), ‘Challenging Realism by Returning to History: The British Committee’s Contribution to IR Forty Years On’, International Relations, 17/3: 273–302.
  • Almond, G. (1990), A Discipline Divided (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).
  • Anghie, A. (2005), Imperialism, Sovereignty, and the Making of International Law (New York: Cambridge University Press).
  • Anievas, A. (2010), Marxism and World Politics (London: Routledge).
  • Anievas, A. (2014), Capital, The State, and War: Class Conflict and Geopolitics in the Thirty Years’ Crisis, 1914–1945 (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).
  • Annan, K. (2004), ‘Rwanda Genocide “Must Leave Us Always With a Sense of Bitter Regret and Abiding Sorrow,” says Secretary-General to New York Memorial Conference’, 26 March 2004, press release, available at: http://www.un.org/press/en/2004/sgsm9223.doc.htm, accessed November 2015.
  • Arendt, H. (1964), Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (New York: Viking).
  • Aristotle (1984), The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, edited by J. Barnes (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Armstrong, D. (1993), Revolution and World Order (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
  • ———— (1999), ‘Law, Justice and the Idea of World Society’, International Affairs, 75/3: 547–61.
  • Ashley, R. (1981), ‘Political Realism and Human Interests’, International Studies Quarterly, 25/2: 204–36.
  • ———— (1984), ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’, International Organization, 38/2: 225–86.
  • ———— (1987), ‘The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Towards a Critical Social Theory of International Politics’, Alternatives, 12/4: 403–34.
  • ———— (1988), ‘Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17/2: 227–62.
  • ———— (1989), ‘Living on Border Lines: Man, Poststructuralism and War’, in J. Der Derian and M. Shapiro (eds), International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics (Lexington, KY: Lexington Books), 259–322.
  • Ashley, R. and Walker, R. B. J. (eds) (1990), ‘Conclusion: Reading Dissidence/Writing the Discipline: Crisis and the Question of Sovereignty in International Studies’, International Studies Quarterly, 34/3: 367–416.
  • Axelrod, R. (1981), ‘The Emergence of Cooperation Among Egoists’, American Political Science Review, 75: 306–18.
  • p. 324Bacevich, A. (2005a), The New American Militarism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • ———— (2005b), ‘The Real World War IV’, Wilson Quarterly, 29/1: 43.
  • ———— (2008), The Limits of Power (New York: Metropolitan Books).
  • ———— (2010), Washington Rules (New York: Metropolitan Books).
  • Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R. W. (2004), The Economics of the World Trading System (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Bain, W. (2003), Between Anarchy and Society: Trusteeship and the Obligations of Power (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Bairoch, P. (1996), ‘Globalisation Myths and Realities: One Century of External Trade and Foreign Investment’, in R. Boyer and D. Drache (eds), States Against Market: The Limits of Globalisation (London: Routledge), 173–92.
  • Baldwin, D. (1985), Economic Statecraft (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Banks, M. (1984), ‘The Evolution of International Relations’, in M. Banks (ed.), Conflict in World Society: A New Perspective on International Relations (Brighton: Harvester Press), 3–21.
  • Barkawi, T. and Laffey, M. (2001), Democracy, Liberalism, and War: Rethinking the Democratic Peace Debate (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).
  • ———— (2006), ‘The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies’, Review of International Studies, 32: 329–52.
  • Barkin, S. (2003), ‘Realist Constructivism,’ International Studies Review, 5: 325–42.
  • Barnett, J. (2001), The Meaning of Environmental Security: Ecological Politics and Policy in the New Security Era (London: Zed Books).
  • Barrett, M. (1980), Women’s Oppression Today (London: Verso).
  • Barnett, M. and Duvall, R. (2005), ‘Power in International Relations’, International Organization, 59: 39–75.
  • Barnett, M. and Finnemore, M. (2004), Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
  • Barry, B. (1973), The Liberal Theory of Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
  • Barry, J. (1999), Rethinking Green Politics (London: Sage Publications).
  • Barry, J. and Eckersley, R. (2005), The State and the Global Ecological Crisis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Bartelson, J. (1995), The Genealogy of Sovereignty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Bastow, S., Dunleavy, P., and Tinkler, J. (2014), The Impact of the Social Sciences: How Academics and Their Research Make a Difference (London: Sage).
  • Bayoumi, T. (1990), ‘Savings-Investment Correlations’, IMF Staff Papers, 37: 360–87.
  • ———— (1997), Financial Integration and Real Activity (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
  • Beardsworth, R. (2011), Cosmopolitanism and International Relations Theory (Cambridge: Polity).
  • Beck, U. (1992), The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, translated by M. Ritter (London: Sage).
  • Beier, M. (2009), International Relations in Uncommon Places: Indigeneity, Cosmology, and the Limits of International Theory (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Beitz, C. R. (1979/1999), Political Theory and International Relations, 2nd edn (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Beitz, C. R., Cohen, M., Scanlon, T., and Simmons, A. J. (eds) (1985), International Ethics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Belkin, A. (2013), Bring me Men: Military Masculinity and the Benign Façade of American Empire 1989–2001 (New York: Columbia University Press).
  • Bellamy, A. (2014), Massacres and Morality: Mass Atrocities in an Age of Civilian Immunity (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Bello, W. (2013), Capitalism’s Last Stand: Deglobalisation in the Age of Austerity? (London: Zed Books).
  • Benjamin, W. (1968), Illuminations, edited and with an introduction by Hannah Arendt (New York: Schocken Books).
  • Benthall, J. (1993), Disasters, Relief and the Media (London: I. B. Tauris).
  • Berger, P. L. (2002), ‘Introduction: The Cultural Dynamics of Globalization’, in P. L. Berger and S. P. Huntington (eds), Many Globalizations: Cultural Diversity in the Contemporary World (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1–16.
  • Bernstein, R. (1979), The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory (London: Methuen).
  • ———— (1983), Beyond Objectivism and Relativism (Oxford: Blackwell).
  • Bhabha, H. (2004), The Location of Culture, 2nd edn (New York: Routledge).
  • Bhaskar, R. (1978), A Realist Theory of Science (Hassocks: Harvester Press).
  • ———— (1979), The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press).
  • Biermann, F. (2014), Earth Systems Governance: World Politics in the Anthropocene (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • p. 325Bin Laden, O. (2001), ‘Text: Bin Laden’s Statement’, Al Jazeera, 7 October.
  • Biswas, S. (2014), Nuclear Desire: Power and the Postcolonial Nuclear Order (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
  • Biswas, S. and Nair, S. (ed.) (2010), International Relations and States of Exception: Margins, Peripheries, and Excluded Bodies (London: Routledge).
  • Blair, T. (2004) ‘Prime Minister’s Press Conference’, 25 May, available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20061004051823/number10.gov.uk/page2991, accessed November 2015.
  • Bleiker, R. (1997), ‘Forget IR Theory’, Alternatives, 22/1: 57–85.
  • ———— (2000), Popular Dissent, Human Agency and Global Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • ———— (2001), ‘The Aesthetic Turn in International Political Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30/3: 509–33.
  • ———— (2005), Divided Korea: Toward a Culture of Reconciliation (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
  • ———— (2012), Aesthetics and World Politics (New York: Palgrave).
  • Blyth, M. (2013), Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Bodansky, D. (2013), ‘The Durban Platform: Issues and Options for a 2015 Agreement’ (Arlington, VA: Center for Climate and Energy Solutions).
  • Boot, M. (2003), ‘Neither New nor Nefarious: The Liberal Empire Strikes Back’, Current History, Nov: 361–6.
  • Booth, K. (1997), ‘Discussion: A Reply to Wallace’, Review of International Studies, 23/2: 371–7.
  • ———— (ed.) (2005), Critical Security Studies and World Politics (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers).
  • Bown, C. and Hoekman, B. (2008), ‘Developing Countries and Enforcement of Trade Agreements: Why Dispute Settlement is Not Enough’, Journal of World Trade, 42/1: 177–203.
  • Brams, S. J. and Marc Kilgour, D. (1991), Game Theory and National Security (New York: Wiley-Blackwell).
  • Branigin, W. (2003), ‘A Gruesome Scene on Highway 9: 10 Dead After Vehicle Shelled at Checkpoint’, The Washington Post, 1 April, A01, available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A61229-2003Mar31?language=printer, accessed 7 April 2009.
  • Brassett, J. and Clarke, C. (2012), ‘Performing the Sub-Prime Crisis: Trauma and the Financial Event’, International Political Sociology, 6/1: 4–20.
  • Breitenbauch, H. (2013), International Relations in France: Writing Between Discipline and State (Oxon: Routledge).
  • Breuning, M., Bredehoft, J., and Walton, E. (2005), ‘Promise and Performance: An Evaluation of Journals in International Relations’, International Studies Perspectives, 6/4: 447–61.
  • Brewer, A. (1990), Marxist Theories of Imperialism: A Critical Survey, 2nd edn (London: Routledge).
  • Brincat, S., Lima, L., and Nunes, J. (2012), Critical Theory in International Relations and Security Studies: Interviews and Reflections (London: Routledge).
  • Bronner, S. E. (2002), Of Critical Theory and its Theorists, 2nd edn (New York: Routledge).
  • Brown, C. (1992), International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf).
  • ———— (1997), Understanding International Relations (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
  • ———— (2002), Sovereignty, Rights and Justice (Cambridge: Polity).
  • ———— (2015), International Society, Global Polity: An Introduction to International Political Theory. (London: Sage).
  • Brown, M. E., Coté Jr, O. R., Lynne-Jones, S. M., and Miller, S. E. (2004) (eds), Offense, Defense, and War (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Brown, S., Coté, O., Lynn-Jones, S., and Miller, S. (eds) (2011), Do Democracies Win Their Wars? (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Brunkhorst, H. (2002), ‘Globalizing Democracy Without a State: Weak Public, Strong Public, Global Constitutionalism’, Millennium, 31/1: 675–90.
  • Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R., and Morrow, J. (2003), The Logic of Political Survival (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Büger, C. and Gadinger, F. (2006), ‘Große Gräben, Brücken, Elfenbeintürme und Klöster? Die Wissensgemeinschaft Internationale Beziehungen und die Politik—Eine kulturtheoretische Neubeschreibung’, in G. Hellmann (ed.), Forschung und Beratung in der Wissensgesellschaft (Baden-Baden: Nomos)
  • Bull, H. (1977/1995), The Anarchical Society: A Study, of Order in World Politics (London: Macmillan).
  • ———— (1996), ‘International Theory: The Case for the Classical Approach’, World Politics, 18.3: 361–77.
  • ———— (2000), ‘International Relations as an Academic Pursuit’, in K. Alderson and A. Hurrell (eds), Hedley Bull on International Society (Basingstoke: Macmillan), 246–64.
  • Bull, H. and Watson, A. (1984), The Expansion of International Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
  • Burchill, S., Linklater, A., Devetak, R., Donnelly, J., Nardin, T., Paterson, M., et al. (1997), Theories of International Relations (Palgrave: Basingstoke).
  • p. 326Burke, A. (2013), ‘Security Cosmopolitanism’, Critical Studies on Security, 1/1: 13–28.
  • Busch, M. L. (2000), ‘Democracy, Consultation, and the Paneling of Disputes Under GATT’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44/4: 425–46.
  • Busch, M. L. and Pelc, K. J. (2015), ‘Dispute Settlement in the WTO’, in L. Martin, (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Political Economy of International Trade (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 400–16.
  • Busch, M. L. and Reinhardt, E. (2006), ‘Three’s a Crowd: Third Parties and WTO Dispute Settlement’, World Politics, 58/3: 446–77.
  • Bush, G. W. (2001a), ‘Address to a Joint Session of Congress and the American People’, White House, 20 September, available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010920.html, accessed 4 May 2006.
  • ———— (2001b), ‘President Discusses War on Terrorism’, White House, 8 November, available at: http://www.whitehouse/gov/news/releases/2001/09/20011108.html, accessed 6 November 2015.
  • ———— (2003), ‘President Bush Rallies Troops at MacDill USAF Base’, 26 March 2003, available at: http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030326-4.html, accessed November 2015.
  • Butler, J. (1993), Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’ (New York: Routledge).
  • Butterfield, H. and Wight, M. (1966) (eds), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Relations (London: Allen & Unwin).
  • Buzan, B. (2001), ‘The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR’, Review of International Studies, 27/3: 471–88.
  • ———— (2004), From International to World Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • ———— (2014) An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach (Cambridge: Polity).
  • Buzan, B. and Little, R. (2000), International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Buzan, B. and Zhang, Y. (2014) Contesting International Society in East Asia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Buzan, B., Jones, C. A., and Little, R. (1993), The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism (New York: Columbia University Press).
  • Buzan, B., Wæver, O., and de Wilde, J. (1998a), Security: A New Framework of Analysis (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).
  • Buzan, B., Held, D., and McGrew, A. (1998b), ‘Realism Versus Cosmopolitanism’, Review of International Studies, 24/3: 387–98.
  • Campbell, D. (1992), Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
  • ———— (1998a), Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, 2nd edn (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
  • ———— (1998b), National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity and Justice in Bosnia (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
  • ———— (2005), ‘The Biopolitics of Security: Oil, Empire and the Sports Utility Vehicle’, American Quarterly, 57/3: 943–72.
  • Campbell, D. T. (1969), ‘Ethnocentrism of Disciplines and the Fish-scale Model of Omniscience’, in M. Sherifand C. W. Sherif (eds), Interdisciplinary Relationships in the Social Sciences (Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing), 328–48.
  • Caney, S. (2005), Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Caprioli, M. and Boyer, M. (2001), ‘Gender, Violence, and International Crisis’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45/4: 503–18.
  • Carisnaes, W., Risse, T., and Simmons, B. A. (eds) (2012), Handbook of International Relations, 2nd edn (London: Sage).
  • Carr, E. H. (1946), The Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, 2nd edn (London: Macmillan).
  • ———— (1987), What Is History? 2nd edn (London: Penguin).
  • Cerny, P. G. (1995), ‘Globalisation and the Changing Logic of Collective Action’, International Organisation, 49/4: 595–625.
  • ———— (1997), ‘Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalisation’, Government and Opposition, 32/1: 251–74.
  • ———— (2000), ‘Political Globalisation and the Competition State’, in R. Stubbs and G. R. D. Underhill (eds), Political Economy and the Changing Global Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • ———— (2014) ‘Globalization and the Resilience of Neoliberalism’, Critical Policy Studies, 8/3: 359–62.
  • Chakrabarty, D. (2000), Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Chayes, A. and Chayes, A. H. (1993), ‘On Compliance’, International Organization, 47/2: 175–205.
  • Checkel, J. T. (1997), ‘International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the Rationalist-Constructivist Divide’, European Journal of International Relations, 3/4: 473–95.
  • Checkel, J. T. (1998), ‘The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory’, World Politics, 50/2; 324–48.
  • p. 327Chernoff, F. (2014), Explanation and Progress in Security studies: Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
  • Chimni, B. S. (2006), ‘Third World Approaches to International Law: Manifesto’, International Community Law Review, 8: 3–27.
  • Chin, C. (1998), In Service and Servitude: Foreign Female Domestic Workers and the Malaysian ‘Modernity’ Project (New York: Columbia University Press).
  • Chin, C. (2013), Cosmopolitan Sex Workers: Women and Migration in a Global City (New York: Oxford University Press).
  • Chowdhry, G. (2007), ‘Edward Said and Contrapuntal Reading: Implications for Critical Interventions in International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 36/1: 101–16.
  • Chowdhry, G. and Nair, S. (eds) (2002), Power, Postcolonialism, and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender, and Class (New York: Routledge).
  • Christoff, P. (1996), ‘Ecological Modernisation, Ecological Modernities’, Environmental Politics, 5/3: 476–500.
  • Christoff, P. and Eckersley, R. (2013), Globalization and the Environment (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield).
  • Clapp, J. and Dauvergne, P. (2011), Paths to a Green World: The Political Economy of the Global Environment (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Clark, B. R. (1983), The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-national Perspective (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
  • Clark, B. R. and Youn, T. I. K. (1976), Academic Power in the United States: Comparative Historic and Structural Perspectives (Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education).
  • Clark, I. (1999), Globalisation and International Relations Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • ———— (2005), Legitimacy in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • ———— (2007), International Legitimacy and World Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • ————(2011), Hegemony in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • ———— (2013), The Vulnerable in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Cochran, M. (1999), Normative Theory in International Relations: A Pragmatic Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Cockburn, P. (2007), The Occupation: War and Resistance in Iraq (London: Verso).
  • Cohn, T. H. (2005), Global Political Economy: Theory and Practice, 3rd edn (New York: Pearson Longman).
  • Colas, A. and Saull, R. (eds) (2006), The War on Terrorism and the American ‘Empire’ after the Cold War (London: Routledge).
  • Coll, S. (2004), Ghost Wars (New York: Penguin).
  • Collins, R. (1975), Conflict Sociology: Towards an Explanatory Science (New York: Academic).
  • ———— (1994), ‘Why the Social Sciences Won’t Become High-consensus, Rapid-discovery Science’, Sociological Forum, 9/2: 155–77.
  • ———— (1998), The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change (Cambridge, MA: Belknap).
  • Conca, K. (2000), ‘Beyond the Statist Frame: Environmental Politics in a Global Economy’, in F. P. Gale and R. M. M’Gonigle (eds), Nature, Production, Power: Towards an Ecological Political Economy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), 141–55.
  • Conca, K. and Dabelko, G. (2003), Environmental Peacemaking (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press).
  • Connolly, W. (1991), Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
  • ———— (2004), ‘Method, Problem, Faith’, in I. Shapiro, R. M. Smith, and T. E. Masoud (eds), Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 332–49.
  • Constantinou, C. M. (1995), ‘NATO’s Caps: European Security and the Future of the North Atlantic Alliance’, Alternatives, 20/2: 147–64.
  • ———— (1996), On the Way to Diplomacy (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
  • Cook, R. (2004), ‘Bush Will Now Celebrate by Putting Fallujah to the Torch’, Guardian, 5 November.
  • Coole, D. and Frost, S. (eds) (2010) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency and Politics (Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press).
  • Copeland, D. C. (2000), The Origins of Major War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
  • Coward, M. (2002), ‘Community as Heterogeneous Ensemble: Mostar and Multiculturalism’, Alternatives, 27/1: 29–66.
  • Cox, R. (1981), ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10/2: 126–55.
  • ———— (1983), ‘Gramsci, Hegemony, and International Relations: An Essay in Method’, Millennium, 12: 162–75.
  • ———— (1986), ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theories’, in R. Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press), 204–54.
  • Cox, R. and Sinclair, T., (1996), Approaches to World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Crawford, N. (2001), Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization and Humanitarian Intervention (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • p. 328———— (2014), Accountability for Killing: Moral Responsibility for Collateral Damage in America’s Post-9/11 Wars (New York: Oxford University Press).
  • Crawford, N. C. and Klotz, A. (1999), How Sanctions Work: Lessons from South Africa (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. (2011), Posthuman International Relations: Complexity, Ecologism and Global Politics (London: Zed Books).
  • Culler, J. (1982), On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
  • Dauphinee, E. (2013), The Politics of Exile (London: Routledge).
  • Dauvergne, P. (2008), The Shadows of Consumption: Consequences for the Global Environment (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Davis, C. (2003), Food Fights over Free Trade: How International Institutions Promote Agricultural Trade Liberalization (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Davis, N. A. (1991), ‘Contemporary Deontology’, in P. Singer (ed.), A Companion to Ethics (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), 205–18.
  • Debrix, F (1999), Re-envisioning Peacekeeping: The UN and the Mobilization of Ideology (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
  • de Goede, M. (2005), Virtue, Fortune and Faith: A Genealogy of Finance (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
  • ———— (2006), International Political Economy and Poststructural Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
  • Deitelhoff, N. (2009), ‘The Discursive Profess of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC’, International Organization, 63/1: 33–65.
  • Deitelhoff, N. and Müller, H. (2005), ‘Theoretical Paradise—empirically lost? Arguing with Habermas’, Review of International Studies, 31: 167–79.
  • Deleuze, G. (1988), Foucault (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
  • Dellas, E., Pattberg, P., and Betsill, M. (2011), ‘Agency in Earth System Governance: Refining a Research Agenda’, Special Issue of International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11/1: 85–98.
  • Der Derian, J. (1987), On Diplomacy: A Genealogy of Western Estrangement (Oxford: Blackwell).
  • ———— (1992), Antidiplomacy: Spies, Terror, Speed, and War (Oxford: Blackwell).
  • ———— (1994) (ed.), Critical Investigations (London: Macmillan).
  • ———— (2001), Virtuous War: Mapping the Military-Industrial-Media-Entertainment Network (Boulder, CO: Westview).
  • ———— (2003), ‘Hedley Bull and the Case for a Post-Classical Approach’, in H. Bauer and E. Brighi (eds), International Relations at LSE: A History of 75 Years (London: Millennium Publishing Group), 61–94.
  • ———— (2009), Critical Practices in International Theory: Selected Essays (New York: Routledge),
  • Der Derian, J. and Shapiro, M. J. (1989) (eds), International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics (Lexington, KY: Lexington Books).
  • Descombes, V. (1981), Modern French Philosophy, translated by L. Scott-Fox and J. M. Harding (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Deudney, D (1990), ‘The Case Against Linking Environmental Degradation to National Security’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 19/3: 461–76.
  • Devetak, R. (1995), ‘The Project of Modernity and International Relations Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 24/1: 27–51.
  • ———— (2014) ‘Postmodernism’, in S. Burchill, A. Linklater, R. Devetak, J. Donnelly, T. Nardin, M. Paterson, et al. (eds), Theories of International Relations, 2nd edn (London: Palgrave), 181–208.
  • Diamond, L. (2004), ‘What Went Wrong in Iraq?’, Foreign Affairs, 83/September–October: 9–22.
  • Dickinson, G. L. (1916), The European Anarchy (New York: Macmillan Company).
  • Diels, H. and Kranz, W. (1956), Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 7th edn (Berlin: WeidmanischeVerlansbuchhandlung).
  • Diez, M. and Steans, J. (eds) (2005), ‘A Useful Dialogue? Habermas and International Relations,’ Review of International Studies 31/1: 127–209.
  • Dillon, M. (1996), The Politics of Security: Towards a Political Philosophy of Continental Thought (London: Routledge).
  • ———— (2000), ‘Poststructuralism, Complexity and Poetics’, Theory, Culture and Society, 17/5: 1–26.
  • ———— (2003), ‘Virtual Security: A Life Science of (Dis) Order’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 32/3: 531–8.
  • Dillon, M. and Reid, J. (2001), ‘Global Liberal Governance: Biopolitics, Security and War’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30/1: 41–66.
  • Dirlik, A. (1997), ‘The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism’, in A. McClintock, A. Mufti, and E. Shohat (eds), Dangerous Liaisons: Gender, Nation and Postcolonial Perspectives (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), 501–28.
  • p. 329Dobson, A. (2003), Citizenship and the Environment (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Doherty, B. and de Geus, M. (1996) (eds), Democracy and Green Political Thought: Sustainability, Rights and Citizenship (London: Routledge).
  • Doty, R. L. (1993), ‘Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-positivist Analysis of US Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines’, International Studies Quarterly, 37/3: 297–320.
  • ———— (1996), Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North–South Relations (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
  • Downs, G. W., Rocke, D. M., and Barsoom, P. N. (2001), ‘Is the Good News About Compliance Good News About Cooperation?’, in L. Martin and B. Simmons (eds), International Institutions: An International Organization Reader (Boston, MA: MIT Press), 279–306.
  • Doyle, M. (1997), Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism (New York and London: Norton).
  • Dunne, T. (1998), Inventing International Society: A History of the English School (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
  • ———— (2005), ‘System, State and Society: How Does it all Hang Together?’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 34/1: 157–70.
  • Dunne, T. and Schmidt, B. (2004), ‘Realism’, in J. Baylis and S. Smith (eds), The Globalization of World Politics, 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Dunne, T. and Wheeler, N. J. (1999), Human Rights in Global Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Dunne, T., Hansen, T., and Wight, C. (2013a), ‘The End of International Relations?’, European Journal of International Relations, 19/3: 405–25.
  • Dunne, T., Kurki, M., and Smith, S. (2013b) (eds), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Eagleton-Pierce, M. (2011), ‘Advancing a Reflexive Theory in International Relations’, Millennium, 39/3: 805–23.
  • Eckersley, R. (2000), ‘Deliberative Democracy, Ecological Representation and Risk: Towards a Democracy of the Affected’, in M. Saward, (ed.), Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, Representation and Association (London: Routledge), 117–32.
  • ———— (2004), The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • ———— (2007), ‘Ecological Intervention: Prospects and Limits’, Ethics and International Affairs, 21/3: 275–396.
  • ———— (2015), ‘Trade in Global Environmental Governance’, in P. Pattberg and F. Zelli (eds), Edward Elgar Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Politics and Governance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
  • The Ecologist, reprinted as Goldsmith, E. (1972), A Blueprint for Survival (Harmondsworth: Penguin).
  • Edkins, J. (1999), Poststructuralism and International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In (Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner).
  • ———— (2000), Whose Hunger?Concepts of Famine, Practices of Aid (Minneapolis. MN: University of Minnesota Press).
  • ———— (2003), Trauma and the Memory of Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • ———— (2013), ‘Novel Writing in International Relations: Openings for a Creative Practice’, Security Dialogue, 44/4: 281–97.
  • ———— (2015), Face Politics (London: Routledge).
  • Edkins J. and Kear, A. (eds) (2013), International Politics and Performance: Critical Aesthetics and Creative Practice (London: Routledge).
  • Elshtain, J. B. (1992), Women and War (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
  • ———— (2003), Just War Against Terror: The Burden of American Power (New York: Basic Books).
  • Elsig, M. (2011), ‘Principal-Agent Theory and the World Trade Organization: Complex Agency and “Missing Delegation”’, European Journal of International Relations, 17/3: 495–517.
  • Enloe, C. (1990), Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics (New York: Routledge).
  • ———— (2010), Nimo’s War, Emma’s War: Making Feminist Sense of the War in Iraq (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
  • Epp, R. (1998), ‘The English School on the Frontiers of International Society: A Hermeneutic Recollection’, Review of International Studies, 24: 47–63.
  • Epstein, C. (2011), ‘Who Speaks? Discourse, the Subject and the Study of Identity in International Politics’, European Journal of International Relations, 17/2: 327–50.
  • ———— (2013), ‘Constructivism or the Eternal Return of Universals in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 19/3: 499–519.
  • Erskine, T. (2003b) (ed.), Can Institutions Have Responsibilities? Collective Moral Agency and International Relations (New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • ———— (2003a), ‘Making Sense of ‘Responsibility in International Relations—Key Questions and Concepts’, in T. Erskine (ed.), Can Institutions Have Responsibilities? Collective Moral Agency and International Relations (New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 1–16.
  • ———— (2008a), Embedded Cosmopolitanism: Duties to Strangers and Enemies in a World of ‘Dislocated Communities’ (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • p. 330———— (2008b), ‘Locating Responsibility: The Problem of Moral Agency in International Relations’, in C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 699–707.
  • ————(2012), ‘Whose Progress, Which Morals? Constructivism, Normative IR Theory and the Limits and Possibilities of Studying Ethics in World Politics’, International Theory, 4/3, 449–68.
  • Escobar, A. (1994), Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Everest, L. (2004), Oil, Power, and Empire (Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press).
  • Fabre, C. (2012), Cosmopolitan War (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Fallows, J. (2006), Blind Into Baghdad: America’s War in Iraq (New York: Vintage).
  • Fattah, K. and Fierke, K. (2009), ‘A Clash of Emotions: The Politics of Humiliation and Political Violence in the Middle East’, European Journal of International Relations, 15/1: 67–93.
  • Fearon, J. and Wendt, A. (2002), ‘Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, and B. A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage), 52–72.
  • Feldstein, M. and Horioka, C. (1980), ‘Domestic Savings and International Capital Flows’, Economic Journal, 90/358: 314–29.
  • Ferguson, J. (1994), The Anti-Politics Machine: ‘Development,’ Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
  • ———— (2006), Global Shadows: African in the Neoliberal World Order (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).
  • Ferguson, K. and Turnbull, P. (1998), Oh, Say, Can You See? The Semiotics of the Military in Hawaii (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
  • Fergusson, N. (2004), Collosus: The Price of America’s Empire (New York: Penguin Press).
  • Fierke, K. M. (2007), Critical Approaches to International Security (London: Polity).
  • Fierke, K. M. and Jorgensen, K. E. (2001), Constructing International Relations: The Next Generation (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe).
  • Finnemore, M. (1996), National Interests and International Society (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
  • Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. (1998), ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organization, 52: 887–918.
  • Foot, R. (2000), Rights Beyond Borders: The Global Community and the Struggle Over Human Rights in China (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Foucault, M. (1972 [1969]), The Archeology of Knowledge, translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith (London: Tavistock Publishers).
  • ———— (1977), ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’, in D. F. Bouchard, (ed.), Language, Counter-memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), 139–64.
  • ———— (1979), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, translated by A. Sheridan (New York: Vintage Books).
  • ———— (1982), ‘Afterword: The Subject and Power’, in H. L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow (eds), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (Brighton: Harvester Press), 208–26.
  • ———— (1984), ‘What is Enlightenment?’, in P. Rabinow (ed.), The Foucault Reader (New York: Pantheon Books), 32–50.
  • ———— (1988), Politics, Philosophy and Culture: Interviews and Other Writings 1977–1984, edited and with an introduction by L. D. Krittman, translated by A. Sheridan et al. (New York and London: Routledge).
  • Frankel, J. A. (1997), Regional Trading Blocs: In the World Economic System (Washington DC: Institute for International Economics).
  • ———— (1998) (ed.), The Regionalisation of the World Economy (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research).
  • Fraser, N. (1997), Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the Postsocialist Condition (New York and London: Routledge).
  • Friedrichs, J. (2004), European Approaches to International Relations Theory: A House with Many Mansions (London: Routledge).
  • Friedrichs, J. and Wæver, O. (2009) ‘Western Europe: Structure and Strategy at the National and Regional Levels’, in A. B. Tickner and O. Wæver (eds), International Relations Scholarship Around the World: Worlding Beyond the West (London and New York: Routledge), 261–85.
  • Frost, M. (1986), Towards a Normative Theory of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • ———— (1996), Ethics in International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Frost, M., Mayall, J., Rengger, N., and Lebow, R. N. (2003, 2005), ‘Two Symposia on “Tragedy, Ethics and International Relations”’, International Relations, 17/4: 480–503 and 19/4: 324–36.
  • Fuchs, S. (1993), ‘A Sociological Theory of Scientific Change’, Social Forces, 71/4: 933–53.
  • Fuerstman, D. and Lavertu, S. (2005), ‘The Academic Hiring Process: A Survey of Departmental Chairs’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 38/4: 731–6.
  • p. 331Fuller, S. (2000), The Governance of Science: Ideology and the Future of the Open Society (Buckingham: Open University Press).
  • ———— (2002 [1988]), Social Epistemology, 2nd edn (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
  • Galbraith, P. W. (2007), The End of Iraq: How American Incompetence Created a War without End (New York: Pocket Books).
  • Gale, F. P. and M’Gonigle, R. M. (eds) (2000), Nature, Production, Power: Towards an Ecological Political Economy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
  • Gallarotti, G. M. (1991), ‘The Limits of International Organization: Systematic Failure in the Management of International Relations’, International Organization, 45/2: 183–220.
  • Gandhi, L. (1998), Postcolonial Theory: A Critical Introduction (New York: Columbia University Press).
  • Gates, S. and. Humes, B. D. (1997), Games, Information, and Politics: Applying Game Theoretic Models to Political Science (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).
  • Gause, III, F. G. (2011) ‘Why the Middle East Studies Missed the Arab Spring’, Foreign Affairs, 90/4 (July/August): 81–90.
  • Geiger, R. L. (2005), ‘The Ten Generations of American Higher Education’, in P. G. Altbach, R. O. Bedahl, and P. J. Gumport (eds), American Higher Education in the Twenty-first Century: Social, Political and Economic Challenges, 2nd edn (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press), 58–70.
  • Geiss, A., Muller, H., and Schoring, N. (eds) (2013), The Militant Face of Democracy: Liberal Forces for Good (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • George, J. (1994), Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations (Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner).
  • Germain, R. D. and Kenny, M. (eds) (1998), ‘Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians’, Review of International Studies 24: 3–21.
  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (London: Sage).
  • Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (Berkeley, CA, and Cambridge: University of California Press and Polity).
  • Gill, S. (ed.) (1995), Gramsci, Historical Materialism, and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Glaser, C. L. (1997), ‘The Security Dilemma Revisited’, World Politics, 50/1: 171–201.
  • ———— (2010), Rational Theory of International Politics: The Logic of Competition and Cooperation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Gleditsch, K. (2002), All International Politics is Local: The Diffusion of Conflict, Integration, and Democratization (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).
  • Goldstein, J. and Keohane, R. O. (1993) (eds), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
  • Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R. O., and Slaughter, A. (2000) ‘Introduction: Legalization and World Politics’, International Organization, 54/3: 385–99.
  • Gong, G. W. (1984), The Standard of ‘Civilization’ in International Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
  • Gonzalez-Pelaez, A. (2005), Human Rights and World Trade: Hunger in International Society (London: Routledge).
  • Goodson, L. P., Dillman, B., and Hira, A. (1999), ‘Ranking the Presses: Political Scientists’ Evaluations of Publisher Quality’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 32/2: 257–62.
  • Goodwin, G. L. (1951) (ed.), The University Teaching of International Relations (Oxford and Paris: Blackwell and Presses Universitaires de France)
  • Gordon, J. (1999), ‘Economic Sanctions, Just War Doctrine, and the “Fearful Spectacle of the Civilian Dead”’, Cross Currents, 49/3, available at: http://www.crosscurrents.org/gordon.htm, accessed November 2015.
  • Gramsci, A. (1971), Selections from the Prison Notebooks, edited by Q. Hoare and G. N. Smith (New York: International Publishers).
  • Grant, J. T. (2005), ‘What Divides Us? The Image and Organization of Political Science’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 38/3: 379–86.
  • Gregory, D. (1995), ‘Between the Book and the Lamp: Imaginative Geographies of Egypt, 1849–50’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 20/1: 29–57.
  • Grieco, J. M. (1990), Cooperation Among Nations: Europe, America, and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
  • ———— (1993), ‘Understanding the Problem of International Cooperation: The Limits of Neoliberal Institutionalism and the Future of Realist Theory’, in D. A. Baldwin (ed.), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate (New York: Columbia University Press), 301–38.
  • Grovogui, S. N. Z. (1996), Sovereigns, Quasi Sovereigns, and Africans: Race and Self-determination in International Law (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
  • p. 332———— (2002), ‘Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition’, European Journal of International Relations, 8/3: 315–38.
  • ———— (2006), Beyond Eurocentrism and Anarchy: Memories of International Order and Institutions (New York: Routledge).
  • Gunnell, J. G. (1991), ‘In Search of the State: Political Science as an Emerging Discipline in the U. S.’, in P. Wagner, B. Wittrock, and R. Whitley (eds), Discourses on Society: The Shaping of the Social Science Disciplines, Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook (Reidel: Kluwer), 123–62.
  • ———— (2002), ‘Handbooks and History: Is it Still the American Science of Politics?’, International Political Science Review, 23/4: 339–54.
  • Guzzini, S. (1998), Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold (London: Routledge).
  • ———— (2005), ‘The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis’, Millennium, 33: 495–521.
  • ———— (2013), ‘The Ends of International Relations Theory: Stages of Reflexivity and Modes of Theorizing’, European Journal of International Relations, 19/3: 521–41.
  • Guzzini, S. and Leander, A. (eds) (2005), Construction and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics (London: Routledge).
  • Haacke, J. (2005), ‘The Frankfurt School and International Relations: On the Centrality of Recognition’, Review of International Studies, 31/1: 181–94.
  • Haas, P. M., Keohane, R. O., and Levy, M. A. (1993) (eds), Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Habermas, J. (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 1 (Boston, MA: Beacon Press).
  • ———— (1996), Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • ———— (2006), The Divided West (London: Polity Press).
  • Haggard, S. and Simmons, B. A. (1987), ‘Theories of International Regimes’, International Organization, 41/3: 491–517.
  • Hajer, M. (1995), The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
  • Hall, I. (2006) The International Thought of Martin Wight (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Halliday, F. (1996), ‘The Future of International Relations: Fears and Hopes’, in S. Smith, Booth, K. and M. Zalewski (eds), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 318–27.
  • Hamati-Ataya, I. (2012), ‘Reflectivity, Reflexivity and Reflexivisms: IR’s Reflexive Turn—and Beyond’, European Journal of International Relations, 19/4: 669–94.
  • Hammond, T. H. (2004), ‘Herding Cats in University Hierarchies: Formal Structure and Policy Choice in American Research Universities’, in R. G. Ehrenberg, (ed.), Governing Academia: Who Is in Charge of the Modern University? (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
  • Hansen, L. (2006), Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War (New York: Routledge).
  • Hansen, T. B. and Stepputat, F. (2005), ‘Introduction’, in T. B. Hansen and F. Stepputat (eds), States of Imagination: Ethnographic Explorations of the Postcolonial State (Durham, NC: Duke University Press), 1: 38.
  • Harbour, F. V. (1999), Thinking About International Ethics: Moral Theory and Cases from American Foreign Policy (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).
  • Harding, S. (1986), The Science Question in Feminism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
  • Hargens, L. (1988), ‘Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates’, American Sociological Review, 53/1: 139–51.
  • Harley, J. B. (1988), ‘Maps, Knowledge, and Power’, in D. Cosgrove and S. Daniels (eds), The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 277–312.
  • Harvey, D. (1989), The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (Oxford: Blackwell).
  • Hawkins, D. G., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D. L., and Tierney, M. J. (2006), Delegation and Agency in International Organizations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Hay, C. (2002), Political Analysis (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
  • ———— (2006), ‘What’s Globalisation Got to Do With It? Economic Interdependence and the Future of European Welfare States’, Government and Opposition, 41/1: 1–22.
  • ———— (2009), ‘Towards a Global Political Economy?’, in D. Lee, J. Steans, C. Hay, D. Hudson, and M. Watson (eds), International Political Economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • ———— (2012) ‘The Dangerous Obsession with Cost Competitiveness … and the Not So Dangerous Obsession with Competitiveness’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36/2: 463–480.
  • ———— (2014), ‘Globalization’s Impact on States’, in Ravenhill, J., (ed.), Global Political Economy, 4th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 255–81.
  • Hay, C. and Payne, A. (2015), Civic Capitalism (Cambridge: Polity).
  • p. 333Hay, C. and Wincott, D. (2012), The Political Economy of European Capitalism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Hayward, T. (2005), Constitutional Environmental Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Hegel, G. F. (1977), The Phenomenology of Spirit, translated by A. V. Miller (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Heinze E. and Steele, B. (eds) (2009), Ethics, Authority, and War: Non-State Actors and the Just War Tradition (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Held, D. (2002), ‘Cosmopolitanism: Ideas, Realities, Deficits’, in D. Held and A. McGrew (eds), Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance (Cambridge: Polity), 305–24.
  • ———— (2003), ‘Cosmopolitanism: Globalisation Tamed?’, Review of International Studies, 29/4: 465–80.
  • ———— (2010), Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities (Cambridge: Polity).
  • Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., and Perraton, J. (1999), Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Culture (Cambridge and Stanford, CA: Polity and Stanford University Press).
  • Herz, J. (1950), ‘Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma’, World Politics, 2/2: 157–80.
  • Hesse, M. (1980), Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science (Brighton: Harvester Press).
  • Hirst, P., Thompson, G., and Bromley, S. (2009), Globalization in Question, 3rd edn (Cambridge: Polity).
  • Hobson, J. M. (2012), The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • ———— (2013), ‘The Other Side of the Westphalian Frontier’, in Seth, S. (ed.), Postcolonial Theory and International Relations: A Critical Introduction (New York: Routledge), 32–48.
  • Hoffman, M. (1987), ‘Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate,’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23/1: 109–18.
  • Hoffmann, S. (1977), ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’, Dædalus, 106/3: 41–60.
  • ———— (1981), Duties Beyond Borders: On the Limits and Possibilities of Ethical International Politics (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press).
  • Hollis, M. (1996), ‘The Last Post?’, in S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 301–8.
  • Hollis, M. and Smith, S. (1990), Explaining and Understanding International Relations (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
  • Holsti, K. J. (1985), The Dividing Discipline (Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin).
  • ———— (2002), ‘Interview with Kal Holsti’, A. Jones, Review of International Studies, 28/3: 619–33.
  • Honneth, A. (1995), The Struggle for Recognition (Albany, NY: SUNY Press).
  • Hooper, C. (2001), Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations, and Gender Politics (New York: Columbia University Press).
  • Hopf, T. (1998), ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’, International Security, 23/1: 171–200.
  • Horkheimer, M. (1992), Critical Theory: Selected Essays (New York: Continuum Press).
  • Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T. (1994), Dialectic of Enlightenment (New York: Continuum Press).
  • Hornborg, A. (1998), ‘Towards and Ecological Theory of Unequal Exchange: Articulating World System Theory and Ecological Economics’, Ecological Economics, 25/1: 127–36.
  • Hourani, A. (1991), A History of the Arab Peoples (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).
  • Howard, P. (2004), ‘Why Not Invade Korea? Threats, Language Games and US Foreign Policy’, International Studies Quarterly, 48/4: 805–28.
  • Hoy, D. C. (2004), Critical Resistance: From Poststructuralism to Post-critique (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Hughes, R. (1991), The Shock of the New, revised edn (New York: Knopf).
  • Huntington, S. (1996), The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon and Schuster).
  • Hurrell, A. (2002), ‘Norms and Ethics in International Relations’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, and B. A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage), 137–54.
  • ———— (2007), On Global Order: Power, Values and the Constitution of International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Hutchings, K. (1999), International Political Theory: Rethinking Ethics in a Global Era (London: Sage).
  • Huth, P. and Allee, T. (2002), The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Ignatieff, M. (2002), ‘Nation-Building Lite’, New York Times Magazine, Jul 28.
  • ———— (2003), ‘The American Empire; The Burden’, New York Times Magazine, Jan 5.
  • Iida, K. (2004), ‘Is WTO Dispute Settlement Effective?’, Global Governance, 10/2: 207–25.
  • Inayatullah, N. (2011), Autobiographical International Relations: I, IR (New York, NY: Routledge).
  • p. 334Inayatullah, N. and Blaney, D. L. (2004), International Relations and the Problem of Difference (New York: Routledge).
  • Inoguchi, T. and Bacon, P. (2001), ‘The Study of International Relations in Japan: Towards a More International Discipline’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 1/1: 1–20.
  • International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme, ‘Great Acceleration’, available at: http://www.igbp.net/globalchange/greatacceleration.4.1b8ae20512db692f2a680001630.html, accessed November 2015.
  • IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K. and Meyer, L.A. (eds)] (Geneva: IPCC).
  • Jackson, P. (2011), The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and its Implications for the Study of World Politics (London: Routledge).
  • Jackson, P. T. (ed.) (2004), ‘Bridging the Gap: Toward a Realist-Constructivist Dialogue,’ International Studies Review 6: 337–52.
  • Jackson, R. H. (1990), Quasi-states: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World, Cambridge Studies in International Relations 12 (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press).
  • ———— (2000), The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Jackson, R. and Sørensen, G. (1999), Introduction to International Relations (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
  • ———— (2007), Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches, 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Jahn, B. (2000), The Cultural Construction of International Relations: The Invention of the State of Nature (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
  • Jameson, F. (1991), Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (New York: Verso).
  • Jay, M. (1971), The Dialectical Imagination (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
  • Jeffery, R. (2006) Hugo Grotius in International Thought (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Jentleson, B. W. (2002), ‘The Need for Praxis: Bringing Policy Relevance Back In’, International Security, 26/4: 169–83.
  • Jervis, R. (1999), ‘Realism, Neoliberalism and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate’, International Security, 24/Summer: 42–63.
  • Jinnah, S. (2010), ‘Overlap Management in the World Trade Organization: Secretariat Influence on Trade-Environment Politics’, Global Environmental Politics, 10/2: 54–79.
  • Joachim, J., Reinalda, B., and Verbeek, B. (2008), International Organizations and Implementation: Enforcers, Managers, Authorities? (London: Routledge).
  • Johnson, J. T. (1984) Can Modern War Be Just? (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
  • ———— (1991), ‘Historical Roots and Sources of the Just War Tradition in Western Cultures’, in J. Kelsey and J. T. Johnson (eds), Just Warand Jihad: Historical and Theoretical Perspectives on War and Peace in Western and Islamic Traditions (New York: Greenwood Press).
  • Jones, B. G. (ed.) (2006), Decolonizing International Relations (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield).
  • Jones, R. J. B. and Willetts, P. (1984) (eds), Interdependence on Trial: Studies in the Theory and Reality of Contemporary Interdependence (New York: St. Martin’s Press)
  • Jordan, R., Maliniak, D., Oakes, A., and Peterson, S. (2009), ‘One Discipline or Many? 2008 TRIP Survey of International Relations Faculty in Ten Countries’, (Williamsburg, VA, Reves Center for Arts and Sciences, College of William and Mary, February 2009).
  • Kahler, M. (1993), ‘International Relations: Still an American Social Science?’, in L. B. Miller and M. J. Smith (eds), Ideas and Ideals (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), 395–414.
  • ———— (1997), ‘Inventing International Relations: Still an American Social Science?’, in L. B. Miller and M. J. Smith (eds), Ideas and Ideals (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), 20–53.
  • Kant, I. [1795] 1970), ‘Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch’, in H. Reiss, (ed.), Kant’s Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • ———— (1989), Kant’s Political Writings, edited by Hans Reiss (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Karp, D. (2014), Responsibility for Human Rights: Responsibility for Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Katzenstein, P. (1996), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press).
  • Katzenstein, P., Keohane, R. O., and Krasner, S. D. (1998), ‘International Organization and the Study of World Politics’, International Organization, 52/4: 645–85.
  • Katznelson, I. and Milner, H. V. (2002) (eds), Political Science: State of the Discipline (New York and London: Norton).
  • Kaufman-Osborn, T. V. (2006), ‘Dividing the Domain of Political Science: On the Fetishism of Subfields’, Polity, 38/1: 41–71.
  • Kaye, D. (2011), ‘Who’s Afraid of the International Criminal Court?’ Foreign Affairs, 90/3: 118–30.
  • p. 335Keene, E. (2002), Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • ———— (2004) International Thought: A Historical Introduction (Cambridge: Polity).
  • Kellner, D. (1989), Critical Theory, Marxism and Modernity (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).
  • Keohane, R. O. (1984), After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • ———— (1986) (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press).
  • ———— (1988), ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’, International Studies Quarterly, 32/4: 379–96.
  • ———— (1989), International Institutions and State Power (Boulder, CO, Westview).
  • ———— (1993), ‘Institutional Theory and the Realist Challenge After the Cold War’, in D. A. Baldwin, (ed.), Neorealismand Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate (New York: Columbia University Press), 269–300.
  • Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. (1971) (eds), Transnational Relations and World Politics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
  • ———— (1977), Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (Boston, MA, and Boulder, CO: Little, Brown and Westview).
  • Keohane, R. O. and Victor, D. (2011), ‘The Regime Complex for Climate Change’, Perspectives on Politics, 9/1: 7–23.
  • Kern, S. (1983), The Culture of Time and Space, 1880–1914 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
  • King, G., Keohane, R. O., and Verba, S. (1994), Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Kinnvall, C. (2005), ‘Not Here, Not Now! The Absence of a European Perestroika Movement’, in K. R. Monroe, (ed.), Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press), 21–44.
  • Kinzer, S. (2003), All the Shah’s Men (New York: Wiley).
  • ———— (2006) Overthrow: America’s Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq (New York: Times Books).
  • Klare, M. (2004), ‘Bush–Cheney Energy Strategy: Procuring the Rest of the World’s Oil’, Foreign Policy in Focus Special Report, January, reprinted at: http://www.resilience.org/stories/2004-01-18/bush-cheney-energy-strategy-procuring-rest-world’s-oil, accessed November 2015.
  • Klein, B. (1994), Strategic Studies and World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Knorr, K. E. and Rosenau, J. N. (1969) (eds), Contending Approaches to International Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Knudsen, C. (2003), ‘Pluralism, Scientific Progress and the Structure of Organization Studies’, in H. Tsoukas and C. Knudsen (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 262–86.
  • Kohl, T. and Brouwer, A. E. (2014), ‘The Development of Trade Blocs in an Era of Globalisation’, Environment and Planning A, 46/7: 1535–53.
  • Kolakowski, L. (1969), The Alienation of Reason: A History of Positivist Thought, translated by N. Guterman (New York: Anchor Books).
  • Koremenos, B. (2001), ‘Loosening the Ties that Bind: A Learning Model of Agreement Flexibility’, International Organization, 55/2: 289–325.
  • Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., and Snidal, D. (eds) (2003), The Rational Design of International Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Korman, S. (1996), The Right of Conquest: The Acquisition of Territory by Force in International Law and Practice (Oxford: Clarendon).
  • Krasner, S. D. (1983) (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
  • ———— (1996), ‘The Accomplishments of International Political Economy’, in S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski (eds), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 108–27.
  • ———— (1999), Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Kratochwil, F. (1989), Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • ———— (2000), ‘Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt’s “Social Theory of International Politics” and the Constructivist Challenge’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29/1: 73–101.
  • ———— (2003), ‘The Monologue of Science’, International Studies Review, 5/1: 128–31.
  • ———— (2006), ‘History, Action and Identity: Revisiting the “Second” Great Debate and Assessing its Importance for Social Theory’, European Journal of International Relations, 12/1: 5–29.
  • Kratochwil, F. and Ruggie, J. R. (1986), ‘International Organization: A State of the Art or an Art of the State’, International Organization, 40/4: 753–75.
  • Krause, K. (1998), ‘Critical theory and Security’, The Research Programme of Critical Security Studies, Cooperation and Conflict, 33/3: 298–333.
  • p. 336Kriesler, H. (2002), ‘Through a Realist Lens’, Conversations with John Mearsheimer, Institute for International Studies, University of California Berkeley, 8 April, available at: http://globetrotter.berkeley.edu/people2/Mearsheimer/mearsheimer-con5.html, accessed 8 November 2015.
  • Krishna, S. (2001), ‘Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations’, Alternatives, 26/4: 401–24.
  • ———— (2009), Globalization and Postcolonialism: Hegemony and Resistance in the Twenty-first Century (Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers).
  • Kristensen, P. M. and Nielsen, R. T. (2013), ‘Constructing a Chinese International Relations Theory: A Sociological Approach to Intellectual Innovation’, International Political Sociology, 7/1: 19–40.
  • Kronsell, A. (2012), Gender, Sex, and Postnational Defense: Militarism and Peacekeeping (New York: Oxford University Press).
  • Kuehls, T. C. (1996), Beyond Sovereign Territory: The Space of Ecopolitics (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
  • Kuhn, T. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
  • Kurki, M. (2008), Causation in International Relations: Reclaiming Causal Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • ———— (2011), ‘The Limitations of the Critical Edge: Reflections on Critical Theory and Philosophical IR Scholarship Today’, Millennium, 40/1: 126–46.
  • Lacher, H. (2006), Beyond Globalization: Capitalism, Territoriality and the International Relations of Modernity (London: Routledge).
  • Laclau, E.C. and Mouffe, C.D. (1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (London: Verso).
  • LaFerrière, E. and Stoett, P. J. (1999), International Relations Theory and Ecological Thought: Towards a Synthesis (London: Routledge).
  • LaFerrière, E. and Stoett, P. J. (2006), International Ecopolitcal Theory: Critical Approaches (Vancouver: UBC Press).
  • Laitin, D. D. (2004), ‘The Political Science Discipline’, in E. D. Mansfield and R. Sisson (eds), The Evolution of Political Knowledge: Theory and Inquiry in American Politics (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press), 11–59.
  • Lakatos, I. (1970), ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (London: Cambridge University Press), 91–196.
  • Lake, D. A. (1993), ‘Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch with Potential?’, International Studies Quarterly, 37: 459–89.
  • ———— (2011), ‘Why “Isms” are Evil: Theory, Epistemology, and Academic Sects as Impediments to Understanding and Progress’, International Studies Quarterly, 55/2, 465–80.
  • Lang A. (2008), Punishment, Justice and International Relations: Ethics and Order after the Cold War (New York: Routledge).
  • ———— (2015), International Political Theory: An Introduction (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Lapid, Y. (1989), ‘The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a “Post-positivist” Era’, International Studies Quarterly, 33/4: 235–54.
  • ———— (2002), ‘Sculpting the Academic Identity: Disciplinary Reflections at the Dawn of a New Millennium’, in D. J. Puchala, (ed.), Visions of International Relations: Assessing an Academic Field (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press), 1–15.
  • ———— (2003), ‘Through Dialogue to Engaged Pluralism: The Unfinished Business of the Third Debate’, International Studies Review, 5: 128–31.
  • Larsen, N. (2000), ‘Determination: Postcolonialism, Poststructuralism, and the Problem of Ideology’, in Afzal-Khan, F. and Seshadri-Crooks, K. (eds), The Pre-Occupation of Postcolonial Studies (Durham, NC: Duke University Press), 140–56.
  • Lazarus, N. (2001), ‘The Fetish of “the West” in Postcolonial Theory’, in C. Bartolovich and N. Lazarus, (eds), Marxism, Modernity, and Postcolonial Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 43–64.
  • Lebow, R. N. (2003), The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests and Orders (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Lepgold, J. and Nincic, M. (2001), Beyond the Ivory Tower: International Relations Theory and the Issue of Policy Relevance (New York: Columbia University Press).
  • Levine, D. (2012), Recovering International Relations: The Promise of Sustainable Critique (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Lewis, W. A. (1981), ‘The Rate of Growth of World Trade, 1830–1973’, in S. Grassman and E. Lundberg (eds), The World Economic Order: Past and Prospects (Basingstoke: Macmillan), 11–26.
  • Leysens, A. (2008), The Critical Theory of Robert W. Cox: Fugitive or Guru? (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Liberman, P. (1996), Does Conquest Pay: The Exploitation of the Occupied Industrial Societies (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Libson, C. (2003), Reliable Partners: How Democracies Have Made a Separate Peace (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • p. 337Linklater, A. (1982/1990), Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations, 2nd edn (London: Macmillan).
  • ———— (1992), ‘The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical-Theoretical Point of View’, Millennium, 21/2: 77–98.
  • ———— (1998), The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era (Cambridge: Polity Press).
  • ———— (2005), ‘The English School’, in S. Burchill, A. Linklater, R. Devetak, J. Donnelly, T. Nardin, M. Paterson, et al. (eds), Theories of International Relations 3rd edn (London: Macmillan), 93–118.
  • ———— (2008), Critical Theory and World Politics (London: Polity Press).
  • Linklater, A. and Suganami, H. (2006), The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Lisle, D. and Pepper, A. (2005), ‘The New Face of Global Hollywood: Black Hawk Down and the Politics of Meta-sovereignty’, Cultural Politics, 1/2: 165–92.
  • Little, R. (1996), ‘The Growing Relevance of Pluralism?’, in S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski (eds), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 66–86.
  • Loomba, A. (2005), Colonialism/Postcolonialism, 2nd edn (New York: Routledge).
  • Low, N. and Gleeson, B. (1998), Justice, Society and Nature: An Exploration of Political Ecology (London: Routledge).
  • Lu, C. (2006), Just and Unjust Interventions in World Politics: Public and Private (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Lukács, G. (1971), History and Class Consciousness (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Lynch, C. (2008), ‘Reflexivity in Research on Civil Society: Constructivist Perspectives’, International Studies Review, 10/4: 708–21.
  • McCracken, A. (2014), The Beauty Trade: Youth, Gender, and Fashion Globalization (New York: Oxford University Press).
  • McCubbins, M. D. and Schwartz, T. (1984), ‘Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms’, American Journal of Political Science, 28/1: 165–79.
  • McDonald, M. (2011), Security, the Environment and Emancipation: Contestation over Environmental Change (London: Routledge).
  • MacIntyre, A. (1981/1985), After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd edn (London: Duckworth).
  • McKibben, W. (2012), ‘Global Warming’s Terrifying New Math’, Rolling Stone Magazine, 19 July, 2012.
  • McMahan, J. (2009), Killing in War (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Maliniak, D., Oakes, A., Peterson, S., and Tierney, M. (2007), The View from the Ivory Tower: TRIP Survey of IR Faculty in the U.S. and Canada (Williamsburg, VA: Reves Center and Arts and Sciences, College of William and Mary).
  • Maliniak, D., Peterson, S., and Tierney, M. J. (2012) Trip Around the World: Teaching, Research and Policy Views of International Relations Faculty in 20 Countries (Williamsburg, VA: College of William and Mary).
  • Manning, C. A. W. (1954), The University Teaching of Social Sciences: International Relations, A Report Prepared on Behalf of the International Studies Conference (Geneva: UNESCO).
  • ———— (1962), The Nature of International Society (London: G. Bell & Sons).
  • Mansfield, E. D. and Pollins, B. M. (2003), Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).
  • Mansfield, E. and Reinhardt, E. (2003), ‘Multilateral Determinants of Regionalism: The Effects of GATT/WTO on the Formation of Regional Trading Arrangements’, International Organization, 57/4: 829–62.
  • Mansfield, E. and Snyder, J. (2005), Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • March, J. G. and Olson, J. P. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions (New York: Free Press).
  • Marcuse, H. (1964), One-Dimensional Man (Boston, MA: Beacon Press).
  • Marshall, M. G. and Cole, B. R. (2014), Global Report 2014: Conflict, Governance, and State Fragility (Vienna, VA, USA: Center for Systemic Peace).
  • Martin, L. (1992), Coercive Cooperation: Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Martin, L. and Simmons, B. (1998), ‘Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions’, International Organization, 52/4: 729–57.
  • ———— (2001) (eds), International Institutions. An International Organization Reader (Boston, MA: MIT Press).
  • Marx, K. (2000), Selected Writings, edited by D. McLellan, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Mason, M. (2007), Environmental Democracy (New York: St Martin’s Press).
  • May, E. (ed.) (1993), American Cold War Strategy (New York: St Martin’s).
  • Mbembe, A. (2001), On the Postcolony (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
  • p. 338Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., and Behrens, W. W. (1972), The Limits to Growth: A Report to the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind (New York: Universe Books).
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (1990), ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’, International Security, 15/1: 5–56.
  • ———— (1994–5), ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, International Security, 19/3: 5–49.
  • ———— (2001), The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: Norton).
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. and Walt, S. (2013) ‘Leaving Theory Behind: Why Simplistic Hypothesis Testing is Bad for International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 19/3: 427–57.
  • Megill, A. (1994) (ed.), Rethinking Objectivity (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).
  • Memmi, A. (1965), The Colonizer and the Colonized (New York: Penguin).
  • Messer-Davidow, E., Shumway, D. S., and Sylvan, D. J. (eds) (1993), Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity (Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia).
  • Milner, H. (1998), ‘Rationalizing Politics: The Emerging Synthesis of International, American, and Comparative Politics’, International Organization, 52/4: 759–86.
  • ———— (2009), ‘Power, Interdependence, and Nonstate Actors in World Politics’, in Milner, H. and Moravcsik, A. (eds), Power, Interests, and Nonstate Actors in World Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Milner, H. and Moravcsik, A., (eds) (2009), Power, Interests, and Nonstate Actors in World Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), 3–30.
  • Mitchell, R. B. (1994), ‘Regime Design Matters: Intentional Oil Pollution and Treaty Compliance’, International Organization, 48/3: 425–58.
  • Mitchell, R. B. and Keilbach, P. M. (2003), ‘Situation Structure and Institutional Design: Reciprocity, Coercion, and Exchange’, in B. Koremenos, C. Lipson, and D. Snidal (eds), The Rational Design of International Institutions, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 131–58.
  • Mitchell, S. M. and Hensel, P. R. (2007), ‘International Institutions and Compliance with Agreements’, American Journal of Political Science, 51/4: 721–37.
  • Mitchell, T. (2000), ‘The Stage of Modernity’, in T. Mitchell (ed.), Questions of Modernity (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press), 1–34.
  • Mitzen, J. (2005), ‘Reading Habermas in Anarchy: Multilateral Diplomacy and Global Public Spheres’, American Political Science Review, 99/3: 401–18.
  • Moeller, S. (1999), Compassion Fatigue: How the Media Sell Disease, Famine, War and Death (New York: Routledge).
  • Mohanty, C. T. (1988), ‘Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourse’, Feminist Review, 30/3: 61–88.
  • ———— (2003), ‘Women Workers and the Politics of Solidarity’, in C. T. Mohanty, (ed.), Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity (Durham, NC: Duke University Press), 139–68.
  • Monmonier, M. (1996), How to Lie with Maps, 2nd edn (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
  • Monroe, K. R. (ed.) (2005), Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
  • Monteiro, N. P. (2014), Theory of Unipolar Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press).
  • Monteiro, N. P. and Ruby, K. (2009), ‘IR and the False Promise of Philosophical Foundations’, International Theory, 1/1: 15–48.
  • Moon, K. H. S. (1997), Sex Among Allies: Military Prostitution in U.S.–Korea Relations (New York: Columbia University Press).
  • Moravscik, A. (2003), ‘Theory Synthesis in International Relations: Real Not Metaphysical’, International Studies Review, 5: 131–6.
  • Morgan, T. C. and Schwebach, V. L. (1997), ‘Fools Suffer Gladly: The Use of Economic Sanctions in International Crises’, International Studies Quarterly, 41/1: 27–50.
  • Morgenthau, H. J. (1947), Scientific Man vs. Power Politics (London: Latimer Press).
  • ———— (1948a), Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Alfred A. Knopf).
  • ———— (1948b), ‘Letter to Michael Oakeshott, 22 May 1948’, Morgenthau Papers, B-44.
  • ———— (1958), Decline of Domestic Politics (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
  • ———— (1960), Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 3rd edn (New York: Alfred A. Knopf).
  • ———— (1966), ‘The Purpose of Political Science’, in J. C. Charlesworth, (ed.), A Design for Political Science: Scope, Objectives and Methods (Philadelphia, PA: American Academy of Political and Social Science), 63–79.
  • ———— (1972), Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 5th edn (New York: Alfred A. Knopf).
  • ———— (1978), Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 5th edn revised (New York: Alfred A. Knopf).
  • Mueller, J. and Mueller, K. (1999), ‘Sanctions of Mass Destruction’, Foreign Affairs, 78/3: 43–53.
  • p. 339Müller, H. (2004), ‘Arguing, Bargaining and all That: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 10/3: 395–435.
  • Muppidi, H. (2012), The Colonial Signs of International Relations (New York: Columbia University Press).
  • Nagel, T. (1972), ‘War and Massacre’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1/2: 123–44.
  • Nandy, A. (1983), The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self Under Colonialism (Delhi: Oxford University Press).
  • Narang, N. and Nelson, R. (2009), ‘Who Are Those Belligerent Democratizers? Reassessing the Impact of Democratization on War’, International Organization, 63/2: 357–79.
  • Nardin, T. (1983), Law, Morality,and the Relations of States (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • ———— (ed.) (1996), The Ethics of War and Peace: Religious and Secular Perspectives (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • ———— (2008), ‘International Ethics’, in C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 594–611.
  • Nardin, T. and Mapel, D. (eds) (1992), Traditions of International Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • NASA/NOAA (2015), ‘NASA, NOAA Find 2014 Warmest Year in Modern Record’, available at: http://www.nasa.gov/press/2015/january/nasa-determines-2014-warmest-year-in-modern-record/, accessed November 2015.
  • Navari, C. (2009), Theorising International Society: English School Methods (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
  • Neufeld, M. (1993), Reconstructing International Relations Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Neumann, I. B. (1996), Russia and the Idea of Europe: A Study in Identity and International Relations (London: Routledge).
  • Neumann, I. B., Malskoo, M., Rumelili, B., and Stoicescu, M. R. (2012), ‘Forum on Critical Realism’, Review of International Studies, 38/2: 473–524.
  • Newell, P. (2008), ‘Civil Society, Corporate Accountability and the Politics of Climate Change’, Global Environmental Politics, 8/3: 122–53.
  • ———— (2012), Globalization and the Environment: Capitalism, Ecology and Power (Cambridge: Polity Press).
  • Nicholson, M. (1996), Causes and Consequenes in International Relations: A Conceptual Study (London: Pinter).
  • Nielson, D. L. and Tierney, M. J. (2003), ‘Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform’, International Organization, 57/2: 241–76.
  • Nixon, R. (2011), Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
  • Nussbaum, M. and Cohen, J. (eds) (2002), For Love of Country? (Boston, MA: Beacon Press).
  • Nye, J. S. and Donahue, J. D. (eds) (2000), Governance in a Globalizing World (Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press).
  • Oatley, T. H. (2003), ‘Multilaterizing Trade and Payments in Postwar Europe’, in B. Koremenos, C. Lipson, and D. Snidal (eds), The Rational Design of International Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 289–310.
  • Oatley, T. H. and Nabors, R. (1998), ‘Redistributive Cooperation: Market Failure, Wealth Transfers, and the Basle Accord’, International Organization, 52/1: 35–54.
  • Obama, B. (2009a) ‘Barack Obama’s Inaugural Address’, New York Times, 20 January.
  • Obama, B. (2009b) ‘Barack Obama’s Cairo Speech’, Guardian, 4 June.
  • Okereke, C. (2008), Global Justice and Neoliberal Environmental Governance (London: Routledge).
  • O’Neill, B. (1994), ‘Chapter 29: Game Theory Models of War and Peace,’ in R. Aumann and S. Hart (eds), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, Vol. 2 (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 995–1053.
  • O’Neill, K. (2009), The Environment and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • O’Neill, O. (1975), ‘Lifeboat Earth’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 4/3: 273–92.
  • ———— (1986), Faces of Hunger: An Essay on Poverty, Justice and Development (London: Allen & Unwin).
  • Ong, A. (2006), Neoliberalism as Exception (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).
  • Onuf, N. (1989), World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press).
  • ———— (2002), ‘Worlds of Our Making: The Strange Career of Constructivism in International Relations’, in D. J. Puchala, (ed.), Visions of International Relations: Assessing an Academic Field (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press), 119–41.
  • Orend, B. (2006), The Morality of War (Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press).
  • Osiander, A. (1994), The State System of Europe 1640–1990: Peacemaking and the Conditions of International Stability (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
  • Østerud, Ø. (1996), ‘Antinomies of Postmodernism in International Studies’, Journal of Peace Research, 33/4: 385–90.
  • Oye, K. (1986) (ed.), Cooperation Under Anarchy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • p. 340Paebike, R. C. (2003), Democracy’s Dilemma: Environment, Social Equity and the Global Economy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Pahre, R. (2003), ‘Most-Favored-Nation Clauses and Clustered Negotiations’, in B. Koremenos, C. Lipson, and D. Snidal, (eds), The Rational Design of International Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 99–130.
  • Palan, R. (2000), ‘A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 26/4: 575–98.
  • Parks, B. C. and Roberts, J. T. (2010), ‘Climate Change, Social Theory and Justice’, Theory, Culture & Society, 27/2–3: 134–66.
  • Parry, B. (2004), ‘The Institutionalization of Postcolonial Studies’, in N. Lazarus, (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Postcolonial Literary Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 66–80.
  • Paterson, M. (2000), Understanding Global Environmental Politics: Domination, Accumulation, Resistance (London: Palgrave).
  • Patomäki, H. (2002), After International Relations: Critical Realism and the (Re)construction of World Politics (London: Routledge).
  • Patomäki, H. and Wight, C. (2000), ‘After Post-Positivism? The Promises of Critical Realism’, International Studies Quarterly, 44/2: 213–37.
  • Pattberg, P. (2007), Private Institutions and Global Governance: The New Politics of Environmental Sustainability (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
  • Pattberg, P. and Wilderberg, O. (2014), ‘Theorising Global Environmental Governance: Key Findings and Future Questions’, Millennium 43/2: 684–705.
  • Pattison, J. (2010) Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility To Protect: Who Should Intervene? (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
  • ———— (2014), The Morality of Private War: The Challenge of Private Military and Security Companies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Pelc, K. J. (2009), ‘Seeking Escape: The Use of Escape Clauses in International Trade Agreements’, International Studies Quarterly, 53/2: 349–68.
  • Pensky, M. (ed.) (2005), Globalizing Critical Theory (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield).
  • Perestroika, Mr. (2000), ‘To the Editor, PS and APSR, On Globalization of the APSA: A Political Science Manifesto’, posted on the Perestroika list serve, 26 October; reprinted in K. R. Monroe (ed.), Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press), 9–11.
  • Peterson, S., Tierney, M. J., and Maliniak, D. (2005), Teaching and Research Practices, Views on the Discipline, and Policy Attitudes of International Relations Faculty at the US College and Universities (Williamsburg, VA: College of William and Mary).
  • Peterson, V. S. and Runyan, A. S. (2013), Global Gender Issues, 4th edn (Boulder, CO: Westview).
  • Petrella, R. (1996), ‘Globalisation and Internationalisation: The Dynamics of the Emerging World Order’, in R. Boyer and D. Drache (eds), States Against Market: The Limits of Globalisation (London: Routledge), 45–61.
  • Pevehouse, J. (2005), Democracy from Above: Regional Organizations and Democratization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Pevehouse, J., and Russett, B. (2006), ‘Democratic Intergovernmental Organizations Promote Peace’, International Organization, 60/4: 969–1000.
  • Phillips, D. L. (2005), Losing Iraq: Inside the Postwar Reconstruction Fiasco (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).
  • Philpott, S. (2001), Rethinking Indonesia: Postcolonial Theory, Authoritarianism and Identity (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Pinker, S. (2011), The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined (London: Viking).
  • Pogge, T. (1989), Realizing Rawls (Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press).
  • Pollack, M. A. (1997), ‘Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EC’, International Organization, 51/1: 99–134.
  • Pollard, R. (1985), Economic Security and the Origins of the Cold War (New York: Columbia University Press).
  • Poovey, M. (1998), A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
  • Popper, K. R. (1959), The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London: Hutchinson).
  • Posen, B. R. (1984), The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the World Wars (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
  • Pratt, M. L. (1992), Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation (London: Routledge).
  • Price, R. (2008), ‘The Ethics of Constructivism’, in C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 317–26.
  • Priest, D. and Arkin, W. (2011), Top Secret America (New York: Little, Brown).
  • Princen, T., Maniates, M., and Conca, K. (2002) (eds), Confronting Consumption (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Prozorov, S. (2014), Ontology and World Politics: Void Universalism (London, Routledge).
  • p. 341Prügl, E. (1999), The Global Construction of Gender: Home-based Work in the Political Economy of the 20th Century (New York: Columbia University Press).
  • Puchala, D. J. (ed.) (2002), Visions of International Relations: Assessing an Academic Field (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press).
  • Rai, S. M. and Reinelt, J. (2014), The Grammar of Politics and Performance (Interventions) (London: Routledge).
  • Rai, S. M. and Waylen, G. (2013), New Frontiers in Feminist Political Economy (London: Routledge).
  • Ralph, J. (2007) Defending the Society of States: Why America Opposes the International Criminal Court and Its Vision of World Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Ramsey, P. (1968/2002), The Just War: Force and Political Responsibility (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield).
  • Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • ———— (1975), ‘Fairness to Goodness’, Philosophical Review, 84: 536–54.
  • ———— (2005), Political Liberalism, expanded edn, Columbia Classics in Philosophy (New York and Chichester: Columbia University Press).
  • Reinhardt, E. (2000), ‘Adjudication Without Enforcement in GATT Disputes’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45/2: 174–95.
  • Reiter, D. and Stam, A. (2002), Democracies at War (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Rengger, N. and Thirkell-White, B. (2007), ‘Editors’ Introduction’, Review of International Studies, 33 (Special Issue): 3–24.
  • Reus-Smit, C. (1999), The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Reus-Smit, C. and Dunne, T. (eds), (2016, in press) The Globalisation of International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Rhode, D. (2012), ‘The Obama Doctrine’, Foreign Policy, 27 February, available at: http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/02/27/the-obama-doctrine/, accessed November 2015.
  • Risse, M. (2012), On Global Justice. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Risse, T. (2000), ‘“Let’s Argue!” : Communicative Action in World Politics’, International Organization, 54/1: 1–39.
  • Risse, T., Ropp, S. C., and Sikkink, K. (eds) (1999), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Roach, S. C. (2006), Politicizing the International Criminal Court: The Convergence of Politics, Ethics, and Law (Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers).
  • ———— (2007), ‘Critical International Theory and Meta-Dialectics: Fourth Debate or Fifth Dimension?’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 35/2: 321–42.
  • ———— (ed.) (2008), Critical Theory and International Relations: A Reader (London: Routledge).
  • ———— (2010), Critical Theory of International Politics: Complementarity, Justice, and Governance (London: Routledge).
  • Roben, V. (2008), ‘The Enforcement Authority of International Institutions’, German Law Journal, 9/11: 1965–86.
  • Roberts, A. and Guelff, R. (eds) (1989), Documents on the Laws of War, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Roberts, J. T. and Parks, B. C. (2007), A Climate of Injustice: Global Inequality, North–South Politics, and Climate Policy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Robinson, F. (1999), Globalising Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory and International Relations (Oxford: Westview Press).
  • Robinson, W. I. (2004), A Theory of Global Capitalism (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).
  • Rochester, J. M. (1986), ‘The Rise and Fall of International Organization as a Field of Study’, International Organization, 40/Autumn: 777–813.
  • Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone K., Persson, A., Chapin, F.S., III, Lambin, E., et al. (2009), ‘Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity’, Ecology and Society, 14/2: 32.
  • Rodin, D. and Shue, H. (2008), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Rorty, R. (1967) (ed.), The Linguistic Turn (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
  • Rose, G. (1998), ‘Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy’, World Politics, 51/October: 144–72.
  • ———— (2001), Visual Methodologies (London: Sage).
  • Rosenau, J. N. (1990), Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Rosenberg, J. (1994), Empire of Civil Society (London: Verso).
  • Rosendorff, P. and Milner, H. V. (2003), ‘The Optimal Design of International Trade Institutions: Uncertainty and Escape’, in B. Koremenos, C. Lipson, and D. Snidal (eds), The Rational Design of International Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 69–98.
  • p. 342Rousseau, D. (2005), Democracy and War: Institutions, Norms, and the Evolution of Interntaional Conflict (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
  • Ruggie, J. G. (1986), ‘Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis,’ in R. O. Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press), 131–57.
  • ———— (1998), ‘What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge’, International Organization, 52/4: 855–85.
  • Rupert, M. (1995), Producing Hegemony (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • ———— (2005), ‘Reflections on Some Lessons Learned from a Decade of Globalisation Studies’, New Political Economy, 10/4, 457–78.
  • ———— (2009), ‘Antonio Gramsci’, in J. Edkins and N. Vaughan-Williams (eds), Critical Theorists and International Relations (London: Routledge), 176–86.
  • Rupert, M. and Smith, H. (eds) (2002), Historical Materialism and Globalisation (London: Routledge).
  • Rupert, M. and Solomon, S. (2006), Globalisation and International Political Economy (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield).
  • Russett, B. (1993), Grasping the Democtratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Russett, B. and O’Neal, J. R. (2003), Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations (New York: Norton).
  • Said, E. (1978), Orientalism (New York: Vintage Books).
  • ———— (1979), Orientalism (New York: Vintage Books).
  • ———— (1993), Culture and Imperialism (New York: Knopf).
  • Sajeb, A. (2013), Postcolonial Encounters in International Relations: The Politics of Transgression in the Maghreb (Abingdon: Routledge).
  • Sands, P. (2008), ‘Stress Hooding, Noise, Nudity, Dogs’, Guardian Weekend, 19 April, 18–27.
  • Sayer, D. (1991), Capitalism and Modernity (London: Routledge).
  • Scahill, J. (2013), Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield (London: Serpent’s Tail).
  • Scarry, E. (1995), The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Scheuerman, W. E. (2008), Frankfurt School Perspectives on Globalization, Democracy, and the Law (London: Routledge).
  • Schlosberg, D. (2007), Defining Environmental Justie: Theories, Movements, and Nature (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Schmidt, B. (1998), The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press).
  • ———— (2008), ‘International Relations Theory: Hegemony or Pluralism?’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 36/2: 295–304.
  • Schmitt, R. (1997), Introduction to Marx and Engels: A Critical Reconstruction, 2nd edn (Boulder, CO: Westview).
  • Schoenbaum, T. J. (1997), ‘International Trade and Protection of the Environment: The Continuing Search for Reconciliation’, The American Journal of International Law, 91/2: 268–313.
  • Schultz, K. (2001), Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy (Stanford , CA: Stanford University Press).
  • Schwartz, W. F. and Sykes, A. O. (2001), ‘The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization’, The Journal of Legal Studies, 31: 181–3, 188–92.
  • Searle, J. R. (1995), The Construction of Social Reality (London: Allen Lane; New York: Free Press).
  • Sending, J. O. (2002), ‘Constitution, Choice and Change: Problems with the ‘Logic of Appropriateness’ and its Use in Constructivist Theory,’ European Journal of International Relations, 8/4: 443–70.
  • Seth, S. (2013), ‘Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations’, in Seth, S. (ed.), Postcolonial Theory and International Relations: A Critical Introduction (New York: Routledge), 15–31.
  • Shapcott, R. (2001), Justice, Community and Dialogue in International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • ———— (2010), International Ethics: A Critical Introduction (Cambridge: Polity).
  • Shapiro, M. J. (1988), The Politics of Representation: Writing Practices in Biography, Photography and Policy Analysis (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press).
  • ———— (2008), Cinematic Geopolitics (London: Routledge).
  • Shepherd, L. J. (2008), Gender, Violence, and Security: Discourse as Practice (London: Zed Books).
  • ———— (2013), Gender, Violence and Popular Culture (London: Routledge).
  • Shohat, E. (1992), ‘Notes on the “Postcolonial”’, Social Text, 31/32, Third World and Post-Colonial Issues, 99–113.
  • Shome, R. (1998), ‘Caught in the Term “Postcolonial” : Why the “Postcolonial” Still Matters’, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 15/2: 203–12.
  • Showstack-Sassoon, A. (2005), ‘Intimations of a Gramscian Approach to Global Civil Society’, in p. 343R. Germain and M. Kenny (eds), The Idea of Global Civil Society: Politics and Ethics in a Globalizing Era (London: Routledge), 35–46.
  • Shue, H. (1980), Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence and United States Foreign Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Sil, R. and Katzenstein, P. J. (2010), Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Silberstein, S. (2002), War of Words: Language, Politics and 9/11 (London: Routledge).
  • Simmons, B. A. (2002), ‘Capacity, Commitment, and Compliance: International Institutions and Territorial Disputes’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46/6: 829–56.
  • Singer, P. (1972), ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1/3: 229–43.
  • ———— (2013), Gendering Global Conflict: Toward a Feminist Theory of War (New York: Columbia University Press).
  • Sjoberg, L. (2013), Gendering Global Conflict: Toward a Feminist Theory of War (New York: Columbia University Press).
  • Skinner, Q. (2002), Visions of Politics: Regarding Method (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Smith, A. (1993), Wealth of Nations, edited by K. Sutherland (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Smith, J. M. (2001), ‘The Politics of Dispute Settlement Design’, in L. Martin, and B. Simmons (eds), International Institutions: An International Organization Reader (Boston, MA: MIT Press), 210–44.
  • Smith, S. (1987), ‘Paradigm Dominance in International Relations: The Development of International Relations as a Social Science’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 16/2: 189–206.
  • ———— (1992), ‘The Forty Years’ Detour: The Resurgence of Normative Theory in International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21/3: 489–506.
  • ———— (1997), ‘Power and Truth: A Reply to William Wallace’, Review of International Studies, 23/4: 507–16.
  • ———— (2004), ‘Singing Our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11 Presidential Address to the International Studies Association, February 27, 2003, Portland, OR’, International Studies Quarterly, 48/3: 499–515.
  • ———— (2008), ‘Debating Schmidt: Theoretical Pluralism in IR’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 36/2: 305–10.
  • Smith, S., Booth, K., and Zalewski, M. (eds) (1996), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Snidal, D. (1985), ‘The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory’, International Organization, 39/4: 579–614.
  • Snyder, J. L. (1991), Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
  • Soguk, N. (1999), States and Strangers: Refugees and Displacements of Statecraft (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
  • Solomon, T. (2014), ‘Time and Subjectivity in World Politics’, International Studies Quarterly, 58: 671–81.
  • Spero, J. and Hart, J. A. (2003), The Politics of International Economic Relations, 6th edn (Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth).
  • Steele, B. J. (2008), Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State (London: Routledge).
  • Steger, M. B. (2009), Globalization: A Very Short Introduction, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Sterling-Folker, J. (2000), ‘Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberalism Institutionalism Compared’, International Studies Quarterly, 44/1, 97–119.
  • ———— (2001), ‘Evolutionary Tendencies in Realist and Liberal IR Theory’, in W. R. Thompson (ed.), Evolutional Interpretations of World Politics (New York: Routledge), 62–109.
  • ———— (2002), ‘Realism and the Constructivist Challenge: Rejecting, Reconstructing or Rereading’, International Studies Review, 4: 73–97.
  • ———— (ed.) (2006), Making Sense of International Relations Theory (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).
  • Stevenson, H. (2013), Institutionalizing Unsustainability: The Paradox of Global Climate Governance (Oakland, CA: University of California Press).
  • Stevenson, H. and Dryzek, J. S. (2014), Democratization Global Governance (Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press).
  • Strange, S. (1983), ‘Cave! Hic Dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis’, in S. D. Krasner, (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), 337–54.
  • ———— (1987), ‘The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony’, International Organization, 41/4: 551–74.
  • Stockholm Resilience Centre (2015), Planetary Boundaries 2.0, available at: http://www.stockholmresilience.org/21/research/research-programmes/planetary-boundaries.html, accessed November 2015.
  • Tang, S. (2013) Social Evolution in International Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • p. 344Thomas, D. C. (1999), ‘The Helsinki Accords and Political Change in Eastern Europe’, in T. Risse, S. C. Ropp, and K. Sikkink (eds), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 205–33.
  • Thompson, E. P. (1978), The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays (London: Merlin Press).
  • Thucydides (1954), History of the Peloponnesian War, translated by R. Warner (New York: Penguin).
  • Tickner, A. B. (2003), ‘Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 32/2: 295–324.
  • Tickner, A. B. and Blaney, D. L. (eds) (2012), Thinking International Relations Differently (London: Routledge).
  • Tickner, A. B. and Wæver, O. (2004), ‘Geo-cultural Epistemologies and IR: Montreal Follow-up Memo’, unpublished paper.
  • ———— (eds) (2009), International Relations Scholarship Around the World, Vol. 1 of ‘Worlding beyond the West’ series (London: Routledge).
  • Tickner, J. A. (1997), ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists’, International Studies Quarterly, 41/4: 611–32.
  • ———— (2001), Gendering World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press).
  • Timmons Roberts, J. and Parks, B. C. (2007), A Climate of Injustice: Global Inequality, North–South Politics, and Climate Policy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Tollefson, C., Gale, F., and Haley, D. (2009), Setting the Standard: Certification, Governance and the Forest Stewardship Council (Vancouver: UBC Press).
  • Toulmin, S. (1972), Human Understanding (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
  • ———— (2008), ‘The Ethics of Feminism’, in C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 408–21.
  • True, J. (2003), Gender, Globalization, and Post-socialism: The Czech Republic after Communism (New York: Columbia University Press).
  • ———— (2008), ‘The Ethics of Feminism’, in C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 408–21.
  • UNFCCC (2011), FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add. 1. Decision 1/CP.17. United Nations, available at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/09a01.pdf, accessed November 2015.
  • UNFCCC (2014), Decision 1/CP.20. United Nations, available at: http://unfccc.int/meetings/lima_dec_2014/session/8530/php/view/decisions.php, accessed November 2015.
  • United Nations (1999), Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 12 ‘On the Right to Adequate Food’ (art. 11) 12/05/1999, available at: http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/0/3d02758c707031d58025677f003b73b9, accessed November 2015.
  • United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development (1987), Our Common Future (the Brundtland Report), available at: http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf, accessed 8 November 2015.
  • US Department of State (2003), ‘US Military Investigators Evaluating Civilian Checkpoint Deaths (Central Command Report, April 1: Iraq Operational Update)’, available at: http://usinfo.org/wf-archive/2003/030401/epf205.htm, accessed 8 November 2015.
  • Valentini, L. (2011), Justice in a Globalized World: A Normative Framework (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • van der Gaag, N. and Nash, C. (1987), Images of Africa: The UK Report, available at: http://www.imaging-famine.org/images_africa.htm, accessed 8 November 2015.
  • van der Pijl, K. (1984), The Making of an Atlantic Ruling Class (London: Verso).
  • Van Evera, S. (1999), Causes of War: Power and the Roots of Conflict (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
  • Vigneswaran, D. and Quirk, J. (2005), ‘The Construction of an Edifice: The Story of a First Great Debate’, Review of International Studies, 31/1: 59–74.
  • Vincent, R. J. (1986), Human Rights in International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Vogler, J. (2003), ‘Taking Institutions Seriously: How Regime Analysis Can Be Relevant to Multilevel Environmental Governance’, Global Environmental Politics, 3/2: 25–39.
  • Wackernagel, M. and Rees, W. (1996), Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth (Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers).
  • Wæver, O. (1995) ‘Securitization and Desecuritization’, in R. D. Lipschutz, (ed.), On Security (New York: Columbia University Press), 46–86.
  • ———— (1996), ‘The Rise and Fall of the Interparadigm Debate’, in S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski (eds), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 149–85.
  • ———— (1997), ‘Figures of International Thought: Introducing Persons Instead of Paradigms’, in I. B Neumann and O. Wæver (eds), The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making? (London: Routledge), 1–40.
  • ———— (1998), ‘The Sociology of a Not so International Discipline: American and European Developments in p. 345International Relations’, International Organization, 52/4: 687–727.
  • ———— (2003), ‘The Structure of the IR Discipline: A Proto-comparative Analysis’, ISA paper, Portland, OR.
  • ———— (2009), ‘Waltz’s Theory of Theory’, International Relations, 23/2: 201–22.
  • ———— (2015), ‘The History and Social Structure of Security Studies as a Practico-Academic Field’, in T. V. Berling and C. Bueger (eds), Capturing Security Expertise: Practice, Power and Responsibility (London: Routledge), 76–108.
  • Wæver, O. and Buzan, B. (2007), ‘After the Return to Theory: The Past, Present, and Future of Security Studies’, in A. Collins, (ed.), Contemporary Security Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 383–402.
  • Walker, R. B. J. (1987), ‘Realism, Change and International Political Theory’, International Studies Quarterly, 31/1: 65–86.
  • ———— (1993), Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Wallace, W. (1996), ‘Truth and Power, Monks and Technocrats: Theory and Practice in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 22/3: 301–21.
  • Wallerstein, I. (2001 [1991]), Unthinking Social Science: The Limits of Nineteenth-century Paradigms, 2nd edn (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press).
  • Walt, S. (1987), The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
  • ———— (1998), ‘International Relations: One World, Many Theories’, Foreign Policy, 110: 29–35.
  • ———— (1999), ‘Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies’, International Security, 23/4: 5–48.
  • Waltz, K. (1979), Theory of International Politics (London: McGraw-Hill; New York: Random House; Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).
  • ———— (1993), ‘The Emerging Structure of International Politics’, International Security, 18/1: 5–43.
  • ———— (1998), ‘Interview’, Review of International Studies, 24/3: 371–86.
  • Walzer, M. (1977/2006), Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, 4th edn (New York: Basic Books).
  • Wapner, P. (1998), Environmental Activismand World Civic Politics (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press).
  • Wasserstrom, R. A. (ed.) (1970), War and Morality (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth).
  • Watson, A. (1992), The Evolution of International Society (London: Routledge).
  • Watson, M. (2001), ‘International Capital Mobility in an Era of Globalisation: Adding a Political Dimension to the “Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle”’, Politics, 21/2: 81–92.
  • Weber, C. (1994), Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State and Symbolic Exchange (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • ———— (1999), Faking It: US Hegemony in a Post-phallic Era (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
  • Weldes, J., Laffey, L.Gusterson, H., and Duvall, R. (eds) (1999), Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communitiesand the Production of Danger (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
  • Welsh, J. M. (1995), Edmund Burke and International Relations (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
  • ———— (2012), ‘A Normative Case for Pluralism: Reassessing Vincent’s Views on Humanitarian Intervention’, International Affairs, 87/5: 1193–204.
  • Wendt, A. (1987), ‘The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations’, International Organization, 41/3: 335–70.
  • ———— (1992), ‘Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, 46/2: 391–425.
  • ———— (1998), ‘Constitution and Causation in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 24/5: 101–17.
  • ———— (1999), Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press).
  • ———— (2015), Quantum Mind and Social Science: Unifying Physical and Social Ontology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Wheeler, N. J. (2000), Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • White, S. (1991), Political Theory and Postmodernism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • White House (2002), ‘National Security Strategy of the United States’ (17 September), available at: http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.ogv/nsc/nss/2002/, accessed November 2015.
  • Whitley, R. (1984), The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
  • ———— (1986), ‘The Structure and Context of Economics as a Scientific Field’, in W. J. Samuels, (ed.), Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology Vol. 4 (Greenwich CT and London: JAI Press), 179–209.
  • ———— (2000), ‘Introduction [to the second edition]. Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century’, in R. Whitley, The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press), ix-xliv.
  • p. 346Whitworth, S. (1994), Feminism and International Relations: Towards a Political Economy of Gender in Interstate and Non-governmental Institutions (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
  • Wiener, A. (2003), ‘Constructivism: The Limits of Bridging Gaps’, Journal of International Relations and Development, 6/3: 252–75.
  • ———— (2008), The Invisible Constitution of Politics: Contested Norms and International Encounters (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Wight, C. (1996), ‘Incommensurability and Cross Paradigm Communication in International Relations Theory: What’s the Frequency Kenneth?’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 25/2: 291–319.
  • ———— (2006), Agents and Structures in International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • ———— (2007) ‘A Manifesto for Scientific Realism in IR: Assuming the Can-Opener Won’t Work!’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 35/2: 379–98.
  • Wight, M. (1977), Systems of States, edited by H. Bull (Leicester: Leicester University Press).
  • ———— (1978), Power Politics, edited by H. Bull and C. Holbraad (Leicester: Leicester University Press).
  • ———— (1991), International Theory: The Three Traditions (Leicester: Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs).
  • Williams, M. C. (2007), Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans Morgenthau in International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Wilson, P. (1998), ‘The Myth of the “First Great Debate”’, Review of International Studies, 24: 1–15.
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1958), Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell).
  • Wohlforth, W. C. (1994–5), ‘Realism and the End of the Cold War’, International Security, 19/1: 91–129.
  • ———— (1999), ‘The Stability of a Unipolar World’, International Security, 24/1: 5–41.
  • Wood, E. M. (2003), Empire of Capital (London: Verso).
  • Woodward, B. (2004), Plan of Attack (New York: Simon & Schuster).
  • Wyn Jones, R. (2001), Critical Theory and World Politics (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).
  • Yan, X. (2011), Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power, edited by D. A. Bell and S. Zhe, translated by E. Ryden (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Young, O. R. (1991), ‘Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society’, International Organization, 45/3: 281–308.
  • Young, O. R. (2001), Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction (Oxford: Blackwell).
  • Youngs, G. (1999), International Relations in a Global Age: A Conceptual Challenge (Cambridge: Polity).
  • Ypi, L. (2012), Global Justice and Avant-Garde Political Agency (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Zagare, F. C. and Kilgour, D. M. (2000), Perfect Deterrence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Zehfuss, M. (2002), Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Zinner, E. and Williams, M. B. (1999), When a Community Weeps: Case Studies in Group Survivorship (London: Bruner/Mazel).