Search Results

This chapter examines the role of energy in foreign policy by focusing on Russia’s decision in 2006 to temporarily stop the flow of natural gas to the Ukraine, along with its impact on European markets. It first explains how energy contributes to national prosperity and underwrites national security, noting that states now desire energy security in the same way that they desire military and economic security. It then considers the political significance of energy during the post-Cold War years before discussing the ‘gas spat’ between Russia and Ukraine. It also explores the European energy insecurity dilemma that followed the spat and shows that much of the current tensions afflicting Europe and Russia are driven by an inability to manage energy security as a potent area of foreign policy.

Membership of the European Union (EU) commits member states to cooperate on foreign policy and speak with a common European voice on international issues. Since the end of the Cold War, the European Union has developed a wide range of economic, diplomatic and military capabilities in foreign policy. The EU has gradually expanded its competencies, power, and actorness beyond what is normally associated with an international intergovernmental organization. This has spurred a lively academic debate about how to conceptualize the EU as an international actor and to what extent the EU represents a deeper process of foreign policy change and transformation. This chapter examines EU enlargement as one of the EU’s most important foreign policy instruments to achieve peace and stability in Europe. EU enlargement is an interesting case for examining the complexity of the EU as a foreign policy actor as it combines both supranational and intergovernmental methods of policy-making. The Eastern enlargement of 2004/2007 moved the EU’s border further east and into the regions that Russia considers its geopolitical spheres of interest.

This chapter examines a sector that has long been vital to the progress of human society, but has only recently come to prominence as a significant foreign policy factor. Energy represents a source of control for those capable of accessing and selling it, a security issue for both suppliers and buyers, and a foreign policy area that challenges virtually all international actors. While energy security has the capacity to maintain stability and generate interdependence between exporting and importing states, the January 2006 ‘gas spat’ between Russia and Ukraine demonstrates energy’s ability to generate deep insecurities between sovereign and commercial actors, and in the process reshape the geopolitical terrain of Europe and key actors on its peripheries. As will be explored, much of the current tensions afflicting Europe and Russia are driven by an inability to manage energy security as a potent area of foreign policy.

This chapter examines feminist perspectives on international relations. It first provides a historical background on the development of feminist IR, paying attention to different kinds of feminist analyses of gender. It then considers feminist perspectives on international security and global politics, along with developments in feminist reanalyses and reformulations of security theory. It illustrates feminist security theory by analysing the contemporary Russia–Ukraine war. It concludes by discussing the contributions that feminist IR can make to the discipline of IR, specifically, and to the practice of international politics, more generally.

This chapter examines the central assumptions of classical realism and its significance for analysis of international politics. Classical realism draws on a wide range of historical figures, from the Greek historian Thucydides, through Renaissance thinkers such as Nicolo Machiavelli, the early modern philosopher Thomas Hobbes, and prominent post-war thinkers such as E. H. Carr and Hans Morgenthau. This chapter examines classical realists’ understandings of the idea of human nature, the state and its role in international politics, the role of power and great powers, and also realism’s relationship with ‘modernity’. The case study discusses classical realism in relation to the Ukraine war. The chapter emphasizes the way in which classical realism recognizes the complexity of international politics and dilemmas which inhere in it.

Nowadays states rarely resort to war to defeat each other or to address war-threatening crises and armed conflicts. Instead, coercive diplomacy has emerged as their strategy of choice when persuasion and other non-military instruments fall short. Coercive diplomacy involves the use of military threats and/or limited force (sticks) coupled with inducements and assurances (carrots) in order to influence the opponent to do something it would prefer not to. States use coercive diplomacy in the hope of achieving their objectives without having to resort to full-scale war. This chapter presents the strategy of coercive diplomacy and its requirements for success and shows how states have employed it to manage crises and conflicts during the three strategic eras that the world has passed through since the end of the Cold War.